Victimizing Researchers by Phishing

victimizing researchers by phishing

Detecting Phishing E-mails by Heterogeneous Classification

This paper presents a system for classifying e-mails into two categories, legitimate and fraudulent. This classifier system is based on the serial application of three filters: a Bayesian filter that classifies the textual content of e-mails, a rulebased filter that classifies the non grammatical content of e-mails and, finally, a filter based on an emulator of fictitious accesses which classif...

Victimized by Phishing: A Heuristic-Systematic Perspective

Phishing has become an ever-present, ever-increasing threat to information security, yet theory-based, systematic research on the behavioral aspect of this phenomenon is rather limited. In this paper, we propose the Heuristic-Systematic Model (HSM) as an overarching theory to solidify the theory base for this line of research. We note the theoretical synergy between HSM and other theories used ...

Misconduct by researchers and authors.

Most scientific research is conducted properly and reported honestly but a few authors invent or manipulate data to reach fraudulent conclusions. Other types of misconduct include deliberately providing incomplete or improperly processed data, failure to follow ethical procedures, failure to obtain informed consent, breach of patient confidentiality, improper award or denial of authorship, fail...

Peer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers

The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...